November 21, 2024

3 thoughts on “Ithaca’s Hinchey Tries to Reinstate “Fairness”

  1. Despite the obvious legal problem of this being an infringement of free speech, the growth of the blogosphere has also complicated any possible implementation of the fairness doctrine. The logical conclusion of this doctrine is that there would have to be an equal number of conservative/liberal blogs from each web provider. How could this possibly be implemented?

  2. Some justification for the fairness doctrine comes for the limited amount of airspace available for broadcasters. Again, the development of the blogosphere sort of corrects this problem; because there is unlimited room for blogs, it is more difficult to make the case that the scarcity of media for expression justifies regulation.

    Here is an article detailing the arguments against the fairness doctrine:
    http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm

    I was unable to find any solid legal arguments/articles in favor of the fairness doctrine, but if anyone finds one, please share it.

    Here’s Obama’s 2008 position on the doctrine:
    http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/114322-Obama_Does_Not_Support_Return_of_Fairness_Doctrine.php

  3. There is something worse than the Fairness Doctrine that I’ve written about before we had the blog up. I’ll repost here 🙂

Comments are closed.