December 22, 2024

2 thoughts on “MRM #88

  1. The 9/11 “Truther” isn’t a professor; he’s a staff member as he says in the first line of the column you link to.

  2. The reason the article was rejected probably has to do with the fact that a very similar editorial was submitted by him in 2007: http://cornellsun.com/node/25366

    He is basically trying to repeat the claims in his new article. I suggest readers check out the third comment from the top on his original article which WAS published in the SUN.

Comments are closed.